Condri
Full Corpus

Every study on health anxiety

A searchable database of every paper indexed on health anxiety, hypochondriasis and illness anxiety disorder — 10,657 studies from 1934 to 2026, each linking straight through to the source. Includes 5,877 adjacent papers on OCD, exposure therapy and related mechanisms.

2,802 randomised trials858 meta-analyses552 systematic reviews9,219 with a DOI

The queries below return 12,725 papers. We judged 2,068 of them irrelevant and filtered them out. They are published under "Excluded papers", each with the reason.

For the strongest designs only, choose "Trials, meta-analyses and reviews" in the design filter. Raw data: papers.json.

The PubMed queries behind this corpus

Paste any of these into PubMed to rebuild the set yourself. Counts will differ slightly from ours as new papers are indexed.

Core — health anxiety

("health anxiety"[Title/Abstract] OR hypochondriasis[Title/Abstract] OR "illness anxiety disorder"[Title/Abstract] OR hypochondriacal[Title/Abstract] OR "hypochondriasis"[MeSH Terms])

Adjacent literature

ocd
"obsessive-compulsive disorder"[MeSH Terms] AND (randomized controlled trial[pt] OR meta-analysis[pt] OR systematic review[pt])
exposure-erp
(exposure and response prevention[tiab] OR exposure therapy[tiab]) AND (anxiety[tiab] OR OCD[tiab] OR obsessive[tiab]) AND (randomized controlled trial[pt] OR meta-analysis[pt] OR systematic review[pt])
reassurance-safety-behaviour
reassurance seeking[tiab] OR safety behavio*[tiab]
intolerance-of-uncertainty
intolerance of uncertainty[tiab]
cyberchondria
cyberchondria[tiab] OR (online health information[tiab] AND anxiety[tiab])
anxiety-cbt
"anxiety disorders"[MeSH Major Topic] AND cognitive behav*[tiab] AND (randomized controlled trial[pt] OR meta-analysis[pt] OR systematic review[pt])
somatic-symptom
"somatoform disorders"[MeSH Terms] OR somatic symptom disorder[tiab] AND (randomized controlled trial[pt] OR meta-analysis[pt] OR systematic review[pt])

What the corpus adds up to

Sample sizes and outcome rates read straight out of the abstracts. Each figure below is a median across every paper that reported one, so it describes the literature rather than any single study.

213,203

people across all trials

1,398 trials reporting a sample size

72

median trial size

smallest 10, largest 12,600

56%

median response rate

reported by 185 papers

0.84

median effect size

across 356 trials and meta-analyses

Papers published per decade

1950s
81
1960s
308
1970s
547
1980s
652
1990s
874
2000s
1395
2010s
2995
2020s
3775

Where this work is published

  1. Behaviour research and therapy345
  2. Journal of anxiety disorders335
  3. Journal of affective disorders217
  4. Journal of psychosomatic research199
  5. Zhurnal nevropatologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova (Moscow, Russia : 1952)154
  6. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology146
  7. Psychological medicine136
  8. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science130

Response rates by method — and why they cannot be ranked

Every bar below is the full range of response rates reported for that method, with the median marked. The medians sit within a few points of each other while the ranges run from 4% to 100%, because each study used a different questionnaire, threshold, comparator and population. Reading a winner off this chart would be reading noise.

Medication (SSRIs)31 papers · median 58%

18.2% – 83.3%

CBT28 papers · median 56%

4.5% – 87.5%

Internet-delivered13 papers · median 60%

31% – 100%

Exposure / ERP12 papers · median 62.8%

7.1% – 94%

ACT2 papers · median 46%

23.8% – 46%

ACT rests on two papers here, which is too few to say anything from. The wide ranges are the finding: no method separates from the others once you look at the spread rather than the headline.

Two things worth knowing before quoting these. Papers report response (a threshold improvement on a named questionnaire) and remission (falling below a clinical cutoff), and both depend on which instrument and which threshold, so the median above pools figures that are not strictly comparable. And the median trial enrols 72 people, which is small; large effects from small trials are exactly where published findings tend to be optimistic.

Loading the corpus…

    More from the research library